Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Bailout Schmailout !!!

What do you think? Would you actually vote for this farce that seems to me a little too much money for a little too many people that are all a little too rich?

I read an article lately about Washington Mutual's buyout by JP Morgan Chase. With gov't brokering, this company was saved from totally going under and it's depositors didn't have to worry about their money. The big thing for me is that we didn't have to use government money.

What struck me as abusive and one of the roots of the problem was that the current CEO (who's only been on the job 3 weeks) will walk away with a minimum of 11.1 million dollars. How does a struggling company hire someone with a multi-million dollar signing bonus? I sure wish when I started a job that they'd pay me even 10,000 dollars up front. "Nice work if you can get it", BUT if we bail out these companies; who is going to be paying those signing bonuses and severance packages? The American taxpayer. It's just NOT what I would call fair.

The everyday worker will lose their job or be laid off, the prices and bank fees will stay the same or be raised, credit card debt will continue to rise and people's bad debt will be sold to loan sharks for collection, and all the time we're paying to be treated badly. Does this sound fair?

Write your Congressmen and Representatives and let them know that you won't take it; you can't stand it; it STINKS! Let them know that elections are coming up and they will be held accountable for thier votes.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

The Financial Crisis





agbo ato



over the past two weeks I have listened in amazement to all the major news outlets tell the american

people they cannot possible understand what is happening on wall street.



we simple need to trust the people in charge



okay



but



I submit that the banking problem is not difficult to understand

it is in fact very easy to understand

and the reason no one is explaining what happened is because the country would be outraged



let me explain it



let me explain it with an example using simple numbers



lets say a bank has a millions on deposit

that means it can lend a million dollars if it secures collateral to secure the loan



so



in simple terms a bank that has a million dollars can offer loans for 100 homes worth 100,000 each



when you come in for the loan the bank pays either the builder or the former owner the $100,000 then

you pay back the loan with interest



the interest is the profit for the bank and as the bank makes loans the value of the banks stock goes up

based on the interest due



these loans are secure because if you default on the loan the bank can reposses your home and sell it to someone else and there is no threat to the original investiment



this process used to be strickly regulated by the federal government



then along came george bush



who said the banks don't need regulations



we will let them do whatever they want

and because mose bankers are white male republicans letting them do what they want will be good for the economy



so



the federal reserve bank which is a key player in all of this



said banks are now free to lay off their loans



what does that mean



it means if you go to a bank and ask for $100,000 the bank can pay the buyer or the previous owner

then they can sell the loan to a third party



so



using our original example



if a bank had a million dollars in deposits before george bush they could make 100 loans for 100,000 dollars

and the 100,000 dollars was secured by 100,000 worth of real property



with no regulations



the banks can now make unlimited loans and it does not matter how much money they have or how much collateral they have



what typically happened is the banks sold the loans to china



this means the bankers were paid the 100,000 by chinese banks plus half the interest and the chinese bank keep the other half of the interest



so for example a bank with a million dollars in deposits could easily make two million dollars in loans

the SEC removed its regulations of the banks so that the bank could say that it was worth two million dollars

which then doubles the value of the banks stock and most of that stock is owned by the bank executives



so what happened



the courts in the United States rules that laying off loans in this manor was illegal and that the second party bank (in this case the chinese banks) had no legal claim on the colateral for the loan



what does that mean



its real real simple



if you buy a home and the bank sells your loan and you stop payment on the loan the bank cannot

reposes your home you cannot loose your home no one can do anything about it



that is the current legal situation



okay



so that means chinese banks have close to a trillion dollars in worthless loans

based on the decisions of the courts those loans have no value



the reason they have no value is because the secondary bank cannot forclose on the home and take possession of the home based on failure to pay the loan



so



the banks sold china commerical paper that has no value



based on the laws of the united states when you sell something that has no value and you represent the

idea that what you sell has value you are committing a crime the crime is called fraud



what the banks did is no different then if I were to sell you the brooklyn bridge



same thing



so in very simple terms that everyone can understand dispite what the news tells us

every major banking institution in the country has committed massive fraud



fraud worth more than a $1000 is a felony punishable by ten years in jail

because home loans are typically for more than a $1000 every banker in this country

faces serious jail time



but only if the justice department has the courage to take action



in my experience the justice department takes the position that it is not possible for white republicans to commit crimes

the justice department beleives that criminal behavior is limited to non europeans

so dont expect any massive arrests



so what was it that congress wanted to do



banks stay in business by using their colateral to borrow money from each other

this is called luquidity



if the banks are holding worthless loans they have no collateral to secure their loans and the

banking business comes to a standstill



so congress proposed that the american people buy the worthless loans



what does that mean



it means the minute we buy them they will have no value

we will never recover the loss and the idiots who are telling us we will make money on the deal on lying



so why does congress want us to buy the loans



it means the banks can essentially committ fraud twice



they committ crime and then double their money by committing the crime twice



that is insane



so how did they propose to do this



one clause in the legislation said that the bank bail out could not be reviewed by the courts



this means the adminstration and congress joined hands to nulify the power of the courts



if you look at the US constitution is says that no two branches of government can unit to nulify the

power of a third branch of government



if the recent banking legislations had passed it would have effectively destoryed the US constitution



based on federal law any conspiracy to destroy the US consititution is considered a crime



the crime is called treason



so



based on the written laws of the United States and based on the fundamental principles of the US constitution everyone who voted for that legislation is guilty of treason



so that is the overview in broad strokes



but god is in the details



once you look at the details it becomes even more bizzare



the federal reserve banks controls the banking industry in america



they came up with this idea and they put the process in motion



they are the criminal masterminds who literally stole billions of dollars from innocent investors around the word



so who are these people



based on the laws of the United States it is illegal to reveal the names of the owners of the Federal Reserve b bank



it is illegal to publish their names and it is illegal to publish how much money they make



in other words it is a crime to identify the criminals



I am not joking



but the insanity does not stop there



the federal reserve bank has permission from the US government to print money



so the one trillion dollar bailout will not be paid by money from the US treasury



the US government will borrow the money from the Federal Reserve bank

which simple creates the money by pusing some buttons on a computer then we pay the bank interest

on lending us money that never existed has no backing and was simply created from thin air

so the bankers make money simply by printing money



when I was young the banks could only print money that was secured by gold

by Nixon took the dollar off the gold standard and now we print money whenever we need it

that is the reason for inflation



it is the reason why when I was young coffee was ten cents a cup and now its two dollars a cup



and here is the big kicker



the only thing we know about the federal reserve bank is that its true name is the bank of england



so



the unknown bankers who created this criminal conspracy made money on the original loans they made money selling the loans now they want to make money by having the taxpayers buy the worthless loans for a second time then they want to make money by lending us the money to pay for the worthless loans



yes that is what is happening



the US constitution says that the US government has the right to print its own money

but instead of doing this we pay the bank of england to print dollars



two presidents have tried to print money and shut down the federal reserve

they were



drum roll please



they were



abe linchon and John F kennedy



lucky break for the bankers that they did not live to implament their plans



so



what is going on here



the federal reserve banks used AIG to create the useless loans



AIG is the insurance company that the US taxpayers have already bailed out



so who is AIG



AIG board of directors George Bush Sr and Bill Clinton



which is why clinton is supporting mcain



why would he support mcain



the answer is simple



the banking fraud we are witnessing today happened twice in the past

the first time led to the great depression



the second time was the S&L scandle of the eighties during the reagan adminstration



the man held responsible for that massive fraud was John Keating

John had two partners who escaped prosecution



Jeb bush Georges brother



and



anothe drum roll please



John Mcain



so



we do know the name of one person who runs the federal reserve bank

lord Rothschild



for the past month his wife appears on Fox News every other day to tell us that she has switched her support

from clinton to mcain



of course she has



if mcain is president he cannot go after the bankers without exposing his own participation in a similar scheme twenty years ago



hello



so the news media tells us that the problem can be fixed by following the guidance of secretary paulson



okay



paulson was teh ceo of lehman brothers



he was knee deep in the fraud before coming to washington

when he left lehman brothers the company gave him a billion dollar bonus

that is one billion with a BEE for his role in selling the chinese worthless morgates



so what does this mean to you and I



george is paying for the way by borrowing 2 billion dollars a day from the chinese



the chinese have said you screwed us so no more loans



that means the federal reserve will print more money to make up for the loss

which means the dollar will be worth less and less



that fact that the dollar is worth less and less on the global market is the reason why the price of

gas is so expense and it is the reason why food is so expense



and nothing being done in washington is going to change that for the average person struggling to make ends meet



my estimation is this



the thirteen members of the federal reserve banks each made about 250 billion dollars each off this latest crisis



and it is against the law to know their names



if that doesn't make you just a little ticked off

check your pulse



and please correct me if I am wrong but none of this is hard to understand



ire



baba Awo Falokun